Friday, December 28, 2012

Tournament

I haven't been posting over the holiday as I've been on vacation, but I'm about to play a double round robin tournament in Michigan this weekend with:
Kevin Czuhai - 2200
Tony Nichols - 2109
Andy Catlin - 1963

I'll post my games and later analysis...

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Bad Sport

I actually look forward to poor sports because now I can call them out on my blog! The first player is: HermanSteiner. In this equal position where I am black, he played the blunder Rxa6.


After I played Bxb3! and won easily, he proceeds to tell me how lucky I was, calls me "luckyboy," etc.  HermanSteiner, I'm so sorry you blundered. If I'm lucky, ok, but at least I'm not the loser!

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Beliavsky - Spassky, Baden 1980

Choose a move -- answers are in the comments. Note: sometimes moves might be equally good or bad.

Position #1
A) Ne6 B) d6 C) Bc6

Position #2
A) Ne6 B) d6 C) g6

Position #3
A) Qe5 B) Nxd5 C) Bxd5

Position #4
A) g5 B) d6 C) Rb4

Position #5
A) d5 B) Rc7 C) Rd7

Position #6
A) Qxh4 B) Rf6 C) Qc1+

Baden 1980

Baden
Vienna, 1980
Average Rating: 2528 (Category 12)
Player Rtng Score S B N B V S L S G S A M G V H J Perf Chg
1: Spassky, Boris V 2615 10.5 / 15 X 1 = = = = = = = = = 1 1 1 1 1 2672 +11
2: Beliavsky, Alexander G 2590 10.5 / 15 0 X = 1 = = 1 1 1 = 1 = = = 1 1 2673 +15
3: Nunn, John DM 2515 10.0 / 15 = = X = 1 = = = = = = 1 1 = 1 1 2654 +29
4: Byrne, Robert E 2530 9.0 / 15 = 0 = X = = = 1 = 1 = = = 1 = 1 2600 +14
5: Vaganian, Rafael A 2590 9.0 / 15 = = 0 = X 1 = 1 = = = = = = 1 1 2596 +0
6: Smejkal, Jan 2565 8.5 / 15 = = = = 0 X = = = = = 1 = = 1 1 2576 +2
7: Liberzon, Vladimir M 2545 8.0 / 15 = 0 = = = = X = = 0 1 1 0 1 = 1 2548 +0
8: Seirawan, Yasser 2510 8.0 / 15 = 0 = 0 0 = = X = = = = 1 1 1 1 2551 +9
9: Gheorghiu, Florin 2605 7.5 / 15 = 0 = = = = = = X = = = = 1 0 1 2523 -18
10: Stean, Michael 2530 7.0 / 15 = = = 0 = = 1 = = X = 0 = 0 = 1 2507 -6
11: Adorjan, Andras 2550 7.0 / 15 = 0 = = = = 0 = = = X = = = 1 = 2506 -11
12: Miles, Anthony J 2545 7.0 / 15 0 = 0 = = 0 0 = = 1 = X = = 1 1 2506 -9
13: Gligoric, Svetozar 2565 6.5 / 15 0 = 0 = = = 1 0 = = = = X 0 1 = 2476 -20
14: Van der Wiel, John TH 2465 6.0 / 15 0 = = 0 = = 0 0 0 1 = = 1 X 0 1 2461 +0
15: Hoelzl, Franz 2415 3.5 / 15 0 0 0 = 0 0 = 0 1 = 0 0 0 1 X 0 2325 -15
16: Janetschek, Karl 2325 2.0 / 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 = 0 1 X 2220 -14

120 games: +29 =67 -24

I spent an hour guessing the moves of the game between the two leaders: Beliavsky-Spassky. I'll post a multiple choice exercise based on the game.

Friday, December 14, 2012

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Amsterdam 1980

I'm going through some of the big tournaments throughout history and analyzing the decisive games of the winners. I have just reached the year 1980, which had the following major events: Amsterdam, Baden, Bad Kissingen, Buenos Aires, Bugojno, Dortmund, Hastings, Las Palmas, London, Soviet Championship, Tilburg, Vrbas, and Wijk aan Zee. I look at them in alphabetical order, so let's take a look at Amsterdam 1980.

Here is the Cross Table:

Amsterdam, 1980
Average Rating: 2582 (Category 14)
Player Rtng Score Ka Ti So Ho Ri Do Va La Perf Chg
1: Karpov, Anatoly 2725 10.0 / 14 XX == == =1 10 =1 11 11 2720 -1
2: Timman, Jan H 2600 9.0 / 14 == XX == =1 == =1 =1 1= 2682 +15
3: Sosonko, Gennadi 2545 8.0 / 14 == == XX == == == 1= =1 2637 +18
4: Hort, Vlastimil 2595 7.5 / 14 =0 =0 == XX =1 == 1= 1= 2609 +1
5: Ribli, Zoltan 2610 7.0 / 14 01 == == =0 XX 1= 01 10 2578 -7
6: Dolmatov, Sergey 2535 7.0 / 14 =0 =0 == == 0= XX 1= 11 2589 +11
7: Van der Wiel, John TH 2465 4.0 / 14 00 =0 0= 0= 10 0= XX 10 2441 -3
8: Larsen, Bent 2585 3.5 / 14 00 0= =0 0= 01 00 01 XX 2389 -36

56 games: +20 =29 -7

I can't really tell you about the history of this tournament, or anything like that. I wasn't even born yet. All I know is that these tournaments in Amsterdam were sponsored by or in some way affiliated with IBM. So, the winner was Karpov and he had 7 wins for me to look at. I'd like to share with you Karpov's win with the black pieces over Bent Larsen. Here is the decisive moment:

Question: White is to move - what is Black's threat?


Answer: 1...Rxe3 2.fxe3 Qxe3+ forking the king and rook.


White just played Nd4 attacking the queen.
Question: What is wrong with that move?

Answer: After 1...Bxd4 2.Bxd4 Qd2 Black has a triple attack.
Question: What are Black's three threats in that position?


Answer: 
1) The Black queen attacks the rook on c1
2) The Black queen attacks the bishop on d4
3) The Black rook threatens 1...Re1+ 2.Rxe1 Qxe1+ 3.Bf1 Ba6

So, if you saw from the diagrammed position: 1...Bxd4 2.Bxd4 Qd2 3.Qf4 Re1+ 4.Rxe1 Qxe1+ 5.Bf1 Ba6, good job because Bent Larsen missed it when he played Nd4.

Here is the complete game:

Fun with GM Kaidanov